Messages in this thread |  | | | Subject | Re: [RFC] RCU and CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT progress | | From | Valdis.Kletnieks@vt ... | | Date | Tue, 10 May 2005 16:18:25 -0400 | |
On Tue, 10 May 2005 22:08:11 +0200, Peter Zijlstra said:
> How about having another boolean indicating the ability to flip the
> selector boolean. This boolean would be set false on an actual flip and
> cleared during a grace period. That way the flips cannot ever interfere
> with one another such that the callbacks would be cleared prematurely.
As all the dining philosophers grab a fork and a spoon and dig in. ;)
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] |  |