![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Iau, 2005-04-28 at 11:34, Bernard Blackham wrote: > Should it be the kernel's responsibility to set SS_CONNECTED when > the connection is established? Or should I go file bugs and submit > patches on all the applications that use non-blocking sockets and > don't call connect() a second time? See posix 1003.1g drafts. I believe from the state diagram there that you should call connect() again once it completes. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-05-01 15:50 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||