lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [May]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: ext3 issue..
Ok, I caught another machine doing it..   So here's the output of: df, 
unmount, fsck.ext3, mount, df

I don't know if it shows anything that would indicate the cause of the
issue though.


#df
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on

/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1
2.0G 465M 1.5G 25% /
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part6
33G -64Z 31G 101% /home



# umount /home


# fsck.ext3 -f -v /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part6
e2fsck 1.34 (25-Jul-2003)
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Inode 8, i_blocks is 65616, should be 65608. Fix<y>? yes

Pass 2: Checking directory structure
Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
/lost+found not found. Create<y>? yes

Pass 4: Checking reference counts
Pass 5: Checking group summary information
Free blocks count wrong for group #2 (47844, counted=30900).
Fix<y>? yes

Free blocks count wrong for group #4 (36926, counted=31744).
Fix<y>? yes

Free blocks count wrong (8435011, counted=8412885).
Fix<y>? yes


/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part6: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****

13 inodes used (0%)
2 non-contiguous inodes (15.4%)
# of inodes with ind/dind/tind blocks: 2/0/0
282288 blocks used (3%)
0 bad blocks
0 large files

2 regular files
1 directory
0 character device files
0 block device files
0 fifos
0 links
0 symbolic links (0 fast symbolic links)
0 sockets
--------
3 files


# mount /home



# df
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1
2.0G 439M 1.5G 24% /
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part6
33G 39M 31G 1% /home


# uname -r
2.6.3-15mdk


# uptime
20:25:26 up 100 days, 12 min, 1 user, load average: 0.01, 0.08, 0.04





Theodore Ts'o wrote:

>On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 09:59:39AM -0500, Davy Durham wrote:
>
>
>>Crazy huh? Well, I unmounted /home and did an fsck -f on the partition
>>and remounted it. Then everything looked okay.
>>
>>
>
>What messages were displayed by e2fsck? What version of the kernel
>are you running?
>
>No, I haven't heard of any such problems with ext2/3 filesystems.
>This is the first time that someone was reported a specific problem
>with the # of blocks used accounting. There is the standard "file
>held open so the number of blocks used is greater than blocks reported
>by du", but that won't cause df to display negative numbers.
>
> - Ted
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-05-02 03:30    [W:0.575 / U:0.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site