Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 01 May 2005 20:27:18 -0500 | From | Davy Durham <> | Subject | Re: ext3 issue.. |
| |
Ok, I caught another machine doing it.. So here's the output of: df, unmount, fsck.ext3, mount, df
I don't know if it shows anything that would indicate the cause of the issue though.
#df Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1 2.0G 465M 1.5G 25% / /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part6 33G -64Z 31G 101% /home
# umount /home
# fsck.ext3 -f -v /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part6 e2fsck 1.34 (25-Jul-2003) Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Inode 8, i_blocks is 65616, should be 65608. Fix<y>? yes
Pass 2: Checking directory structure Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity /lost+found not found. Create<y>? yes
Pass 4: Checking reference counts Pass 5: Checking group summary information Free blocks count wrong for group #2 (47844, counted=30900). Fix<y>? yes
Free blocks count wrong for group #4 (36926, counted=31744). Fix<y>? yes
Free blocks count wrong (8435011, counted=8412885). Fix<y>? yes
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part6: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
13 inodes used (0%) 2 non-contiguous inodes (15.4%) # of inodes with ind/dind/tind blocks: 2/0/0 282288 blocks used (3%) 0 bad blocks 0 large files
2 regular files 1 directory 0 character device files 0 block device files 0 fifos 0 links 0 symbolic links (0 fast symbolic links) 0 sockets -------- 3 files
# mount /home
# df Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1 2.0G 439M 1.5G 24% / /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part6 33G 39M 31G 1% /home
# uname -r 2.6.3-15mdk
# uptime 20:25:26 up 100 days, 12 min, 1 user, load average: 0.01, 0.08, 0.04
Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 09:59:39AM -0500, Davy Durham wrote: > > >>Crazy huh? Well, I unmounted /home and did an fsck -f on the partition >>and remounted it. Then everything looked okay. >> >> > >What messages were displayed by e2fsck? What version of the kernel >are you running? > >No, I haven't heard of any such problems with ext2/3 filesystems. >This is the first time that someone was reported a specific problem >with the # of blocks used accounting. There is the standard "file >held open so the number of blocks used is greater than blocks reported >by du", but that won't cause df to display negative numbers. > > - Ted >- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |