[lkml]   [2005]   [May]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch] properly stop devices before poweroff

    > > Without this patch, Linux provokes emergency disk shutdowns and
    > > similar nastiness. It was in SuSE kernels for some time, IIRC.
    > >
    > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <>
    > Hi Pavel,
    > Although I like using pm_message_t, I'm not sure if we want to commit to only
    > PMSG_SUSPEND and PMSG_FREEZE for shutdown and reboot. Would it be possible
    > to create a PMSG_HALT and PMSG_REBOOT? I think this would give drivers more
    > control and flexability to make the right decision. What is your opinion?
    > Of course, I'm still considering the posibility that we really want to do
    > PMSG_SUSPEND on a shutdown. This may work ok on X86, I'm not sure about other
    > architectures.

    Thats okay, nobody really knows yet. I believe that SUSPEND and HALT
    are very similar, and flags best way to separate them. I believe that
    FREEZE and REBOOT are very similar, too, and again would use flags to
    tell between them.

    > I know you mentioned previously adding more flags and data to pm_message_t,
    > what exactly are your plans?

    First I want type checking for pm_message_t. That's 2.6.12-early
    material. Then, when it is *really clear* that flags are needed, I'll
    add them. "really needed" as in "we have a driver where it matters".
    Boycott Kodak -- for their patent abuse against Java.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-05-02 01:20    [W:0.024 / U:2.696 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site