[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
    On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 09:15:07AM -0300, Humberto Massa wrote:
    > This is where you are wrong IMMHO. All that is needed for you
    > to distribute the hexdump blob under the GPL is a declaration
    > from the copyright holder saying "this, to me, is the
    > preferred form for modification of the firmware and hence the
    > source code under the GPL."

    I strongly disagree. This could be an open door to to anyone claiming that
    whatever binary is the prefered form of modification.


    Sven Luther

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-04-08 10:22    [W:0.036 / U:63.992 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site