![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 08:21:28AM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > > > > On UP do not. > > > > Shouldn't we should be fixing the MIPS implementation of > > atomic_sub_return to not do the sync on UP then? > > Unfortunately not, that sync is required exactly for return value store. On UP? -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-04-08 06:22 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||