[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [Fwd: Re: connector is missing in 2.6.12-rc2-mm1]
    On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 09:11:56AM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
    > > Yes but what will go wrong on uni-processor MIPS when you don't do the
    > > sync in atomic_sub_return?
    > Sync synchornizes cached mamory access,
    > without it new value may be stored only into cache,
    > but not into memory.

    I know, the same thing holds for most architectures, including i386.
    However, this is not an issue for uni-processor kernels anywhere else,
    so what's so special about MIPS?

    Visit Openswan at
    Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <>
    Home Page:
    PGP Key:
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-04-08 07:14    [W:0.019 / U:1.848 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site