[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Fwd: Re: connector is missing in 2.6.12-rc2-mm1]
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 09:11:56AM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> > Yes but what will go wrong on uni-processor MIPS when you don't do the
> > sync in atomic_sub_return?
> Sync synchornizes cached mamory access,
> without it new value may be stored only into cache,
> but not into memory.

I know, the same thing holds for most architectures, including i386.
However, this is not an issue for uni-processor kernels anywhere else,
so what's so special about MIPS?

Visit Openswan at
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <>
Home Page:
PGP Key:
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-08 07:14    [W:0.065 / U:2.496 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site