lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: [Fwd: Re: connector is missing in 2.6.12-rc2-mm1]
    From
    On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 09:11:56AM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
    >
    > > Yes but what will go wrong on uni-processor MIPS when you don't do the
    > > sync in atomic_sub_return?
    >
    > Sync synchornizes cached mamory access,
    > without it new value may be stored only into cache,
    > but not into memory.

    I know, the same thing holds for most architectures, including i386.
    However, this is not an issue for uni-processor kernels anywhere else,
    so what's so special about MIPS?

    Cheers,
    --
    Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
    Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
    Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
    PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-04-08 07:14    [W:0.023 / U:0.236 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site