![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:53:02 +1000 Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> wrote: > Yes but what will go wrong on uni-processor MIPS when you don't do the > sync in atomic_sub_return? Indeed. I see nothing in those quotes which indicate that the SYNC is needed on uniprocessor. It's only saying things such as "SYNC only affects load and store instructions" and "LL/SC can only be performed on cacheable memory". Stuff like that. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-04-08 07:00 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||