Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 7 Apr 2005 16:45:58 +0200 | From | Jens Axboe <> | Subject | Re: [OOPS] 2.6.11 - NMI lockup with CFQ scheduler |
| |
On Thu, Apr 07 2005, James Bottomley wrote: > On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 15:32 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > > I think Christophs point is that why add sdev_lock as a pointer, instead > > of just killing it? It's only used in one location, so it's not really > > that confusing (and a comment could fix that). > > Because any use of sdev->request_queue->queue_lock would likely succeed > even after we've freed the device and released the queue. If it's a > pointer and we null it after free and release, then any later use will > trigger an immediate NULL deref oops.
So clear ->request_queue instead.
-- Jens Axboe
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |