lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateWed, 06 Apr 2005 17:51:06 +1000
FromNick Piggin <>
SubjectRe: [patch 2/5] sched: NULL domains
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> 
> 
>>* Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>2/5
>>
>>>The previous patch fixed the last 2 places that directly access a
>>>runqueue's sched-domain and assume it cannot be NULL.
>>>
>>>We can now use a NULL domain instead of a dummy domain to signify
>>>no balancing is to happen. No functional changes.
>>>
>>>Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
>>
>>Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
   ^^^

Thanks.

> 
> 
> if the previous 'remove degenerate domains' patch would go away then 
> this patch needs to be merged/modified. (and most of the others as well)
> 

I probably should respin this so it goes in *first* anyway.
Rather than doing half in the remove degenerate domains and
half here.

-- 
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-06 11:31    [W:0.645 / U:0.430 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans