![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
* Frank Rowand <frowand@mvista.com> wrote:
> I looked at all the architectures and found that the disparity of the
> type of the "lock" field in struct rwlock_t is even larger than I had
> indicated in my earlier email. I am attaching a proof of concept
> patch to handle this. If this looks like a good method to you then I
> will create a real patch against your current patch, and include i386,
> mips, x86_64, and ppc.
> +#include <asm/raw_spinlock.h>
> typedef struct {
> - volatile unsigned long lock;
> + ARCH_RAW_RWLOCK_LOCK
maybe the simplest method would be to let architectures to define the
raw spinlock type after all. I was hoping to standardize things across
all architectures, but maybe it's not possible.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-04-06 11:31 [W:1.189 / U:0.210 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||