![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Hi, On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 23:33, Nathan Lynch wrote: > > I'd say fix the smpboot code so that it doesn't create new idle tasks > except during boot. I'd like the the CPU hotremove case just likes the case that CPU isn't boot. A non-boot CPU hasn't a idle thread. But you may think it's not worthy doing. Anyway, I will keep the idle thread in a updated patch like what you said. > > > We've been> > > doing cpu removal on ppc64 logical partitions for a while and never > > > needed to do anything like this. > > Did it remove idle thread? or dead cpu is in a busy loop of idle?> > Neither. The cpu is definitely offline, but there is no reason to > free the idle thread.> > > > > > Maybe idle_task_exit would suffice?> > idle_task_exit seems just drop mm. We need destroy the idle task for > > physical CPU hotplug, right?> > No.> > > > > > > I don't understand the need for this, either. The existing cpu > > > hotplug notifier in the scheduler takes care of initializing the sched > > > domains and groups appropriately for online/offline events; why do you > > > need to touch the runqueue structures?> > If a CPU is physically hotremoved from the system, shouldn't we clean > > its runqueue?> > No. It should make zero difference to the scheduler whether the "play > dead" cpu hotplug or "physical" hotplug is being used. Keeping some fields like 'cpu_load' are meanless for a hotadded CPU to me. Just ignore them? Thanks, Shaohua - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-04-06 13:31 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||