![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Nish Aravamudan wrote: > Perhaps not discussed before, but definitely a known issue. Check out > sys_nanosleep(), which adds an extra jiffy to the delay if there is > going to be one. My patch, which uses human-time (or at least more so > than currently), should not have issues like this. What would be then the most precise and reliable delaying possibility in the present kernel? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-04-30 17:37 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||