lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSat, 30 Apr 2005 17:32:46 +0200
FromOlivier Croquette <>
SubjectRe: setitimer timer expires too early
Nish Aravamudan wrote:

> Perhaps not discussed before, but definitely a known issue. Check out
> sys_nanosleep(), which adds an extra jiffy to the delay if there is
> going to be one. My patch, which uses human-time (or at least more so
> than currently), should not have issues like this.

What would be then the most precise and reliable delaying possibility in 
the present kernel?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-30 17:37    [from the cache]
©2003-2008