Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 04 Apr 2005 01:20:44 +0200 | From | Dag Arne Osvik <> | Subject | Re: Use of C99 int types |
| |
Grzegorz Kulewski wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Apr 2005, Dag Arne Osvik wrote: > >> (...) And, at least in theory, long may even provide less than 32 bits. > > > Are you sure? > > My copy of famous C book by B. W. Kernighan and D. Ritchie says that > > sizeof(short) <= sizeof(int) <= sizeof(long) > > and > > sizeof(short) >= 16, > sizeof(int) >= 16, > sizeof(long) >= 32. > > The book is about ANSI C not C99 but I think this is still valid. > > Am I wrong?
No, I just looked it up (section 2.2), and you're right.
-- Dag Arne
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |