Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 29 Apr 2005 10:09:38 -0700 (PDT) | From | Linus Torvalds <> | Subject | Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark |
| |
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Matt Mackall wrote: > > That's because no one paid attention until I posted performance > numbers comparing it to git! Mercurial's goals are: > > - to scale to the kernel development process > - to do clone/pull style development > - to be efficient in CPU, memory, bandwidth, and disk space > for all the common SCM operations > - to have strong repo integrity
Ok, sounds good. Have you looked at how it scales over time, ie what happens with files that have a lot of delta's?
Let's see how these things work out..
Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |