[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC/PATCH 0/5] read/write on attribute w/o show/store should return -ENOSYS
    On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 12:30:09AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
    > Hi,
    > Jean Delvare has noticed that if a driver happens to declare its
    > attribute as RW but doesn't provide store() method attempt to write
    > into such attribute will cause spinning process as most of the
    > attribute implementations return 0 in case of missing store causing
    > endless retries. In some cases missing show/store will return -EPERM,
    > -EACCESS or -EINVAL.
    > I think we should unify implementations and have them all return -ENOSYS
    > (function not implemented) when corresponding method (show/store) is
    > missing.

    What is the POSIX standard for this? ENOSYS or EACCESS?

    Or anyone have a link that I can look this up at?


    greg k-h

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-04-28 19:31    [W:0.026 / U:65.024 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site