[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1b/7] dlm: core locking
    On Wednesday 27 April 2005 09:41, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
    > ...I assume that the delivery of a "node down" membership event
    > implies that said node also has been fenced.
    > So we can't deliver it raw membership events. Noted.

    Just to pick a nit: there is no way to be sure a membership event might not
    still be on the way to the dead node, however the rest of the cluster knows
    the node is dead and can ignore it, in theory. (In practice, only (g)dlm and
    gfs are well glued into the cman membership protocol, and other components,
    e.g., cluster block devices and applications, need to be looked at with
    squinty eyes.)


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-04-28 04:55    [W:0.018 / U:7.792 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site