lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateMon, 25 Apr 2005 21:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
FromLinus Torvalds <>
SubjectRe: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks

On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 07:08:28PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> > If you're checking in a change to 1000+ files, you're doing
> > something wrong.
> 
> arch or subsystem merge?

No, if it's a merge, you just suck in all the already-compressed objects.  

You never compress anything new - you get the objects, you update your
tree index, and you're done. No overhead anywhere - a clean merge may
_look_ like it's changing thousands of files, but it didn't change a
single _object_ anywhere, it just re-arranged the objects and created a
new view of them.

Most merges are literally just a tree-level thing. Sometimes you have to 
do a content merge, but that tends to be a file or two.

			Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-26 04:26    [from the cache]
©2003-2008