lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: preempt-count oddities - still looking for comments :)
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Robert Love wrote:

> On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 19:31 +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > Replying to myself here since the initial mail got no response. Here's
> > hoping that it showing up on the list again draws some comments :-)
>
> I didn't think it was that big of a deal. ;-)
>
It's not really that big of a deal. I was just currious if I'd gotten it
right since I spend a good deal of time digging for possible reasons for
the differences (and finding none). :-)

> It seems the right approach. Personally, I would of made the type an
> s32, since fixed-sizes seems to be sensible in the thread_info
> structure, but an int is the same thing. Cool with me.
>
I'll update the patch(es) then and use __s32 in the structure and s32
elsewhere.

> Acked-by: Robert Love <rml@novell.com>
>
Thanks.

> Robert Love
>

--
Jesper Juhl


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-26 19:52    [W:0.041 / U:0.336 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site