lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Linux 2.6.12-rc3
    On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 09:14:01PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
    > On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Al Viro wrote:
    > > As far as I can see that's the minimally intrusive header changes needed
    > > to avoid problems - better than variant with splitting sched.h as in m68k CVS.
    >
    > We can discuss about that. IIRC, HCH is also in favor of splitting off struct
    > task_struct from sched.h.

    Sure, but splitting sched.h is a separate story. Mixing it with m68k
    merge will only make both harder. It requires more include reordering
    and I'd rather keep that headache separate from m68k issues. I agree
    that eventual splitup of sched.h makes sense. However, I think that
    going for minimally intrusive variant of merge and then dealing with
    sched.h would be easier for everyone.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-04-26 05:28    [W:0.020 / U:0.160 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site