lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: more git updates..
felipe.alfaro@gmail.com (Felipe Alfaro Solana)  wrote on 21.04.05 in <6f6293f10504210220744af114@mail.gmail.com>:

> On 20 Apr 2005 22:29:00 +0200, Kai Henningsen <kaih@khms.westfalen.de>
> > > wrote: If you're actually worried about it, it'd be better to just use a
> > > different hash, like one of the SHA-2's (probably a better choice
> > > anyway), instead of SHA-1.
> >
> > How could that help? *Every* hash has hash collisions. It's an unavoidable
> > result of using less bits than the original data has.
>
> SHA-2 allows for 256, 384 and 512-bit hashes, which provides greater
> resistance to collisions.

So? It's still finite.

MfG Kai
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-24 10:43    [W:0.169 / U:0.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site