lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: more git updates..
    hpa@zytor.com (H. Peter Anvin)  wrote on 11.04.05 in <d3dvps$347$1@terminus.zytor.com>:

    > Followup to: <20050410065307.GC13853@64m.dyndns.org>
    > By author: Christopher Li <lkml@chrisli.org>
    > In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
    > >
    > > There is one problem though. How about the SHA1 hash collision?
    > > Even the chance is very remote, you don't want to lose some data do due
    > > to "software" error. I think it is OK that no handle that
    > > case right now. On the other hand, it will be nice to detect that
    > > and give out a big error message if it really happens.
    > >
    >
    > If you're actually worried about it, it'd be better to just use a
    > different hash, like one of the SHA-2's (probably a better choice
    > anyway), instead of SHA-1.

    How could that help? *Every* hash has hash collisions. It's an unavoidable
    result of using less bits than the original data has.

    MfG Kai
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-04-20 23:11    [W:0.025 / U:0.064 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site