lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: more git updates..
hpa@zytor.com (H. Peter Anvin)  wrote on 11.04.05 in <d3dvps$347$1@terminus.zytor.com>:

> Followup to: <20050410065307.GC13853@64m.dyndns.org>
> By author: Christopher Li <lkml@chrisli.org>
> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> >
> > There is one problem though. How about the SHA1 hash collision?
> > Even the chance is very remote, you don't want to lose some data do due
> > to "software" error. I think it is OK that no handle that
> > case right now. On the other hand, it will be nice to detect that
> > and give out a big error message if it really happens.
> >
>
> If you're actually worried about it, it'd be better to just use a
> different hash, like one of the SHA-2's (probably a better choice
> anyway), instead of SHA-1.

How could that help? *Every* hash has hash collisions. It's an unavoidable
result of using less bits than the original data has.

MfG Kai
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-20 23:11    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans