[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: iomapping a big endian area
On Sat, 2005-04-02 at 20:08 -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> > Did anyone have a preference for the API? I was thinking
> > ioread32_native, but ioread32be is fine too.
> I think doing foo{be,le}{8,16,32}() would be consistent with
> our byteorder.h interface names.

Thinking about this some more, I know of no case of a BE bus connected
to a LE system, nor do I think anyone would ever create such a beast, so
our only missing interface is for a BE bus on a BE system.

Thus, I think io{read,write}{16,32}_native are better interfaces ...
they basically mean pass memory operations without byte swaps, so
they're well defined on both BE and LE systems and correspond exactly to
our existing _raw_{read,write}{w,l} calls (principle of least surprise).


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-06 13:31    [W:0.102 / U:2.676 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site