Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 20 Apr 2005 00:26:10 +0200 | From | Petr Baudis <> | Subject | Re: [GIT PATCH] I2C and W1 bugfixes for 2.6.12-rc2 |
| |
Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 12:19:01AM CEST, I got a letter where Steven Cole <elenstev@mesatop.com> told me that... > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > >On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote: > > > >>Nice, it looks like the merge of this tree, and my usb tree worked just > >>fine. > > > > > >Yup, it all seems to work out. > > [many files patched] > patching file mm/mmap.c > patching file net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c > patching file scripts/ver_linux > ----------------------^^^^^^^^^ > Hey, that's my patch! Last...and least. > But perhaps a progress bar right about here might be > a good thing for the terminally impatient. > > real 3m54.909s > user 0m14.835s > sys 0m10.587s > > 4 minutes might be long enough to cause some folks to lose hope.
I'm wondering if doing
if [ "$(show-diff)" ]; then git diff | git apply else checkout-cache -f -a fi
would actually buy us some time; or, how common is it for people to have no local changes whatsoever, and whether relative slowdown of additional show-diff to git diff would actually matter.
-- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ C++: an octopus made by nailing extra legs onto a dog. -- Steve Taylor - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |