lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:
> On 4/19/05, Bodo Eggert <7eggert@gmx.de> wrote:

> > Allowing user mounts with no* should be allways ok (no config needed
> > besides the ulimit), and mounting specified files to defined locations
> > is allready supported by fstab.
> >
>
> Do folks think that the limits should be per-user or per-process for
> user-mounts, what about separate limits for # of private namespaces
> and # of mounts?

Per-user.

> The fstab support doesn't seem to provide enough flexibility for
> certain situations, say I want to support mounting any remote file
> system, as long as its in the user's private hierarchy?
[...]

The dir is owned by the user, therefore it's allowed with no*.
--
Top 100 things you don't want the sysadmin to say:
11. Can you get VMS for this Sparc thingy?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-19 21:29    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site