Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 19 Apr 2005 18:02:43 +0200 (CEST) | From | Bodo Eggert <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits) |
| |
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote: > On 4/19/05, Bodo Eggert <7eggert@gmx.de> wrote:
> > Allowing user mounts with no* should be allways ok (no config needed > > besides the ulimit), and mounting specified files to defined locations > > is allready supported by fstab. > > > > Do folks think that the limits should be per-user or per-process for > user-mounts, what about separate limits for # of private namespaces > and # of mounts?
Per-user.
> The fstab support doesn't seem to provide enough flexibility for > certain situations, say I want to support mounting any remote file > system, as long as its in the user's private hierarchy? [...]
The dir is owned by the user, therefore it's allowed with no*. -- Top 100 things you don't want the sysadmin to say: 11. Can you get VMS for this Sparc thingy? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |