lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)
    On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:
    > On 4/19/05, Bodo Eggert <7eggert@gmx.de> wrote:

    > > Allowing user mounts with no* should be allways ok (no config needed
    > > besides the ulimit), and mounting specified files to defined locations
    > > is allready supported by fstab.
    > >
    >
    > Do folks think that the limits should be per-user or per-process for
    > user-mounts, what about separate limits for # of private namespaces
    > and # of mounts?

    Per-user.

    > The fstab support doesn't seem to provide enough flexibility for
    > certain situations, say I want to support mounting any remote file
    > system, as long as its in the user's private hierarchy?
    [...]

    The dir is owned by the user, therefore it's allowed with no*.
    --
    Top 100 things you don't want the sysadmin to say:
    11. Can you get VMS for this Sparc thingy?
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-04-19 21:29    [W:0.027 / U:88.440 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site