lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: intercepting syscalls
On Fri, 15 Apr 2005, Igor Shmukler wrote:

> Thank you very much. I will check this out.
> A thanks to everyone else who contributed. I would still love to know
> why this is a bad idea.

Because there is no safe way in which you could have multiple
of these modules loaded simultaneously - say one security
module and AFS. There is an SMP race during the installing
of the hooks, and the modules can still wreak havoc if they
get unloaded in the wrong order...

There just isn't a good way to hook into the syscall table.

--
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-18 13:58    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site