Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 18 Apr 2005 17:26:28 +0100 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: intercepting syscalls |
| |
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 12:20:06PM -0400, Igor Shmukler wrote: > I don't think that drivers have to be architecture independent. Why is > this a problem?
Actually, yes a driver should generally be architecture independent. There's some exception for things dealing with lowlevel architecture- dependent things.
> I would even agree that it might be beneficial to develop guidelines > for developing stackable modules that intercept system calls, but I > think that reasons beyond races are of less importance.
No, because we have no interest in supporting that. Explain is your problem and show us the code and we might find a better design.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |