lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] AES assembler implementation for x86_64
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> That is not specifically against this patch, but before we add another
> AES implementation, I'd like to find a better solution for the general
> AES selection.

That would be nice as I didn't like having to duplicate a whole Kconfig
entry which in fact means that it is triplicated now.
I'm fine with any solution here but I do believe whatever solution is
for the crypto maintainers to decide.

[snip]

>>+ depends on CRYPTO && (X86 && !X86_64)
>>+ depends on CRYPTO && X86 && !X86_64
>>...
>
>
> This doesn't make any difference.
>
> I think the former version was better readable, but that's no strong
> opinion.

This was only personal preference during development and actually you're
right, the former version is better readable.
--
Andreas Steinmetz SPAMmers use robotrap@domdv.de
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-17 22:33    [W:0.027 / U:0.468 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site