lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: FUSYN and RT
Date
> > > 
> > /** A fuqueue, a prioritized wait queue usable from
> kernel space. */
> > struct fuqueue {
> > spinlock_t lock;
> > struct plist wlist;
> > struct fuqueue_ops *ops;
> > };
> >
>
> Would the above spinlock_t be a raw_spinlock_t? This goes
> back to my first question. I'm not sure how familiar you are
> with Ingo's work, but he has turned all spinlocks into
> mutexes, and when you really need an original spinlock, you
> declare it with raw_spinlock_t.
>

This one probably should be a raw_spinlock.
This lock is only held to protect access to the queues.
Since the queues are already priority ordered, there is
little benefit to ordering -the order of insertion-
in case of contention on a queue, compared with the complexity.

Just what you want to say to a guy who says he is tired ;)

Sven



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-16 05:03    [W:2.422 / U:0.004 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site