Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 15 Apr 2005 09:24:56 +0200 | From | Tomasz Chmielewski <> | Subject | Re: poor SATA performance under 2.6.11 (with < 2.6.11 is OK)? |
| |
Chris Wright wrote: > * Tomasz Chmielewski (mangoo@interia.pl) wrote: > >>or should I wait for 2.6.11.7 (?), where it should be corrected?
well, indeed, a week ago or more :)
> Wait, no longer, 2.6.11.7 has been here already ;-) However, nothing in > this area was touched. If there's an outstanding issue, please chase it > down, and if it's reasonable regression fix we can consider it for > the -stable tree.
OK so Tomasz Torch suggested that my drive was blacklisted somewhere after 2.6.8.1 (it's the last kernel on which I have good performance).
Does drive blacklisting = very poor performance? And no drive blacklisting = good performance, and possibly data corruption?
Tomek - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |