lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: poor SATA performance under 2.6.11 (with < 2.6.11 is OK)?
Chris Wright wrote:
> * Tomasz Chmielewski (mangoo@interia.pl) wrote:
>
>>or should I wait for 2.6.11.7 (?), where it should be corrected?

well, indeed, a week ago or more :)


> Wait, no longer, 2.6.11.7 has been here already ;-) However, nothing in
> this area was touched. If there's an outstanding issue, please chase it
> down, and if it's reasonable regression fix we can consider it for
> the -stable tree.

OK so Tomasz Torch suggested that my drive was blacklisted somewhere
after 2.6.8.1 (it's the last kernel on which I have good performance).

Does drive blacklisting = very poor performance?
And no drive blacklisting = good performance, and possibly data corruption?


Tomek
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-15 09:28    [W:0.120 / U:0.928 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site