lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateWed, 13 Apr 2005 02:14:08 +0200
FromAndrea Arcangeli <>
SubjectRe: Re: more git updates..
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 04:45:07PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Yes. CVS is much denser.>> CVS is also total crap. So your point is?

I wasn't suggesting to use CVS. I meant that for a newly developed SCM,
the CVS/SCCS format as storage may be more appealing than the current
git format. I guess I should have said RCS instead of CVS, sorry if that
created any confusion. The arch/darcs approach of pratically storing
patches would also be much denser but it has no efficient way of doing
"rcs up -p 1.x" on a file, that doesn't involve potentially unpacking
tons of unrelated changesets.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-13 00:24    [W:0.292 / U:0.600 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans