Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Tue, 12 Apr 2005 15:49:07 -0700 (PDT) | | From | Linus Torvalds <> | | Subject | Re: more git updates.. |
| |
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > > Does that mean that the 64 K changes imported from bk would take ~ 3 GB? > Is that real?
That's a _guess_.
> Have to tried to import it?
It would take days.
> I'm going to import the CVS data (with cvsps) - as the CVS "misses" half > the changes, the resulting archive should be half in size too?
No. The CVS archive is going to be almost the same size. BKCVS gets about 98% of all the data. It just doesn't show the complex merge graphs, but those are "small" in comparison.
> I don't know how much space did bk use, but 3 GB for the full history > is reasonable for most people, isn't it? Especially that one can purge > older data.
I think it's entirely reasonable, yes. But I may be off by an order of magnitude. I based the 3GB on estimating form the sparse tree, but I wasn't being too careful. Andrew estimated 2GB per year (at our current historical rate of changes) based on my merge with him. So it's in that general range of 3-6GB, I htink.
Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |