![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> writes: > The full .git archive for 199 versions of the kernel (the 2.6.12-rc2 one > and a test-run of 198 patches from Andrew) is 111MB. In other words, > adding 198 "full" new kernels only grew the archive by 9MB (that's all > "actual disk usage" btw - the files themselves are smaller, but since they > all end up taking up a full disk block..) Does that mean that the 64 K changes imported from bk would take ~ 3 GB? Is that real? Have to tried to import it? I'm going to import the CVS data (with cvsps) - as the CVS "misses" half the changes, the resulting archive should be half in size too? I don't know how much space did bk use, but 3 GB for the full history is reasonable for most people, isn't it? Especially that one can purge older data. -- Krzysztof Halasa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-04-13 00:56 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||