[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: more git updates..
    Linus Torvalds <> writes:

    > The full .git archive for 199 versions of the kernel (the 2.6.12-rc2 one
    > and a test-run of 198 patches from Andrew) is 111MB. In other words,
    > adding 198 "full" new kernels only grew the archive by 9MB (that's all
    > "actual disk usage" btw - the files themselves are smaller, but since they
    > all end up taking up a full disk block..)

    Does that mean that the 64 K changes imported from bk would take ~ 3 GB?
    Is that real?

    Have to tried to import it?
    I'm going to import the CVS data (with cvsps) - as the CVS "misses" half
    the changes, the resulting archive should be half in size too?

    I don't know how much space did bk use, but 3 GB for the full history
    is reasonable for most people, isn't it? Especially that one can purge
    older data.
    Krzysztof Halasa
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-04-13 00:56    [W:0.018 / U:12.076 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site