lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
David Schwartz wrote:

> > On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 08:07:03PM -0700, David Schwartz wrote:
>
>
> >> The way you stop someone from distributing part of your work is
> >> by arguing that the work they are distributing is a derivative
> >> work of your work and they had no right to *make* it in the first
> >> place. See, for example, Mulcahy v. Cheetah Learning.
>
>
> > Er, that's one way, but not *the* way. I could grant you
> > permission to create derivatives of my work, but not to
> > redistribute them. To stop you from distributing them, I'd argue
> > that you had no right to distribute them--you *did* have the right
> > to make it in the first place.
>
>
> You could do that be means of a contract, but I don't think you could
> it do by means of a copyright license. The problem is that there is
> no right to control the distribution of derivative works for you to
> withhold from me.
Wrong, sorry. Copyright is a *monopoly* on some activities (copy,
distribution of copies, making *and* distribution of derivative works).

HTH,
Massa


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-11 13:58    [W:0.177 / U:0.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site