![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru> wrote:
>
> > > +static int cbus_event_thread(void *data)
> > > +{
> > > + int i, non_empty = 0, empty = 0;
> > > + struct cbus_event_container *c;
> > > +
> > > + daemonize(cbus_name);
> > > + allow_signal(SIGTERM);
> > > + set_user_nice(current, 19);
> >
> > Please use the kthread api for managing this thread.
> >
> > Is a new kernel thread needed?
>
> Logic behind cbus is following:
> 1. make insert operation return as soon as possible,
> 2. deferring actual message delivering to the safe time
>
> That thread does second point.
But does it need a new thread rather than using the existing keventd?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-04-06 13:31 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||