[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC] -stable, how it's going to work.
    On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 10:17 +0000, Russell King wrote:
    > On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 11:10:59AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
    > > On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 10:56 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
    > > > One rule I'm missing:
    > > >
    > > > - It must be accepted to mainline.
    > > >
    > >
    > > I absolutely agree with Andi on this one.
    > What about the case (as highlighted in previous discussions) that the
    > stable tree needs a simple "dirty" fix, whereas mainline takes the
    > complex "clean" fix?

    that's the exception I talked about a bit later in my mail. It should be
    rare and very deliberate. And in fact once the mainline change ripples
    out into maturity I rather replace the -stable one with that later on,
    even if it's a bit more invasive.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:11    [W:0.021 / U:0.704 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site