[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Direct io on block device has performance regression on 2.6.x kernel
    "Chen, Kenneth W" <> wrote:
    > > Did you generate a kernel profile?
    > Top 40 kernel hot functions, percentage is normalized to kernel utilization.
    > _spin_unlock_irqrestore 23.54%
    > _spin_unlock_irq 19.27%


    Is that with CONFIG_PREEMPT? If so, and if you disable CONFIG_PREEMPT,
    this cost should be accounting the the spin_unlock() caller and we can see
    who the culprit is. Perhaps dio->bio_lock.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:11    [W:0.043 / U:32.276 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site