[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFQ] Rules for accepting patches into the linux-releases tree
    On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 02:21:46PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
    > Anything else anyone can think of? Any objections to any of these?
    > I based them off of Linus's original list.
    > thanks,
    > greg k-h
    > ------
    > Rules on what kind of patches are accepted, and what ones are not, into
    > the "linux-release" tree.
    > - It can not bigger than 100 lines, with context.
    > - It must fix only one thing.
    > - It must fix a real bug that bothers people (not a, "This could be a
    > problem..." type thing.)
    > - It must fix a problem that causes a build error (but not for things
    > marked CONFIG_BROKEN), an oops, a hang, or a real security issue.

    "and breakage of previously working functionality" ?

    > - No "theoretical race condition" issues, unless an explanation of how
    > the race can be exploited.
    > - It can not contain any "trivial" fixes in it (spelling changes,
    > whitespace cleanups, etc.)
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [W:0.020 / U:2.596 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site