Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 6 Mar 2005 23:43:17 +0100 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering |
| |
Hi!
> > The point is that it's happening anyway. See Andres' -as tree which > > is the basis for the Debian vendor kernel. Getting that up to an > > official status as 2.6.x.y would be very nice (and having it on > > linux.bkbits.net) > > IMHO it is nowhere near conservative enough (or at times complete > enough) to be a 2.6.x.y kernel. In some respects -ac is closer but it > also isn't as conservative as a real 2.6.x.y should be. > > 2.6.x.y needs several people to keep it tight and to ensure there is > always cover on a security fix.
Eh?
Like you add security fix and then some formatting change to hide it?
Pavel -- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |