Messages in this thread |  | | | Subject | Re: [RFQ] Rules for accepting patches into the linux-releases tree | | From | Valdis.Kletnieks@vt ... | | Date | Sat, 05 Mar 2005 03:19:52 -0500 | |
On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 23:08:55 CST, Ian Pilcher said:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > Anything else anyone can think of? Any objections to any of these?
> > I based them off of Linus's original list.
>
> Must already be in Linus tree (i.e. 2.6.X+1)?
Not workable. There's a high probability that we hit a bug where Linus
commits a more extensive "correct" solution, but 2.6.X.1 includes a much
simpler band-aid that's technically bogus, but stops a panic-on-boot bug
from manifesting.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] |  |