![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 04:28:02PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 02:36:14PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > But we end up with a cset in the permanent kernel history which simply > > > should not have been there. > > > > Is this really a big deal? > > Once? No. If it ends up being "par for the course", it's bad. The amount of stuff in the sucker tree shouldn't really amount to /that/ many patches should it ? If it does, then 2.6.x is in worse shape than we've all been admitting. Would it be that much work to just send the 'meat' as gnu patches, and leave the not-for-linus stuff alone ? Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:10 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||