![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Guillaume Thouvenin wrote: > Is it possible to merge BSD and CSA? I mean with CSA, there is a part > that does per-process accounting. For exemple in the > linux-2.6.9.acct_mm.patch the two functions update_mem_hiwater() and > csa_update_integrals() update fields in the current (and parent) > process. So maybe you can improve the BSD per-process accounting or > maybe CSA can replace the BSD per-process accounting? Yes, that was also my preferred direction - make CSA able to also write BSD acct format, and replace the existing BSD accounting with CSA. However it seems this will still increase the amount of kernel code quite a bit. Sorry for not going into any details, I have to leave right now and will be offline for two weeks. Tim - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:10 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||