Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 4 Mar 2005 12:58:43 -0800 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: Linux 2.6.11.1 |
| |
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 12:44:31PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote: > > > > A few of us $suckers will be trying to maintain a 2.6.x.y set of > > releases that happen after 2.6.x is released. > > Just to test things out a bit... > > Here's the list of things which we might choose to put into 2.6.11.2. I was > planning on sending them in for 2.6.12 when that was going to be > errata-only.
Ok, care to forward them on?
> From 2.6.11-mm1: > > cramfs-small-stat2-fix.patch > setup_per_zone_lowmem_reserve-oops-fix.patch > dv1394-ioctl-retval-fix.patch > ppc32-compilation-fixes-for-ebony-luan-and-ocotea.patch > nfsd--sgi-921857-find-broken-with-nohide-on-nfsv3.patch > nfsd--exportfs-reduce-stack-usage.patch > nfsd--svcrpc-add-a-per-flavor-set_client-method.patch > nfsd--svcrpc-rename-pg_authenticate.patch > nfsd--svcrpc-move-export-table-checks-to-a-per-program-pg_add_client-method.patch > nfsd--nfs4-use-new-pg_set_client-method-to-simplify-nfs4-callback-authentication.patch > nfsd--lockd-dont-try-to-match-callback-requests-against-export-table.patch > audit-mips-fix.patch > make-st-seekable-again.patch > > wrt the nfsd patches, Neil said: > > The problem they fix is that currently: > Client A holds a lock > Client B tries to get the lock and blocks > Client A drops the lock > **Client B doesn't get the lock immediately, but has to wait for a > timeout. (several seconds)
Hm, odds are the nfsd one doesn't fit our list of "acceptable things", but let's see the patches...
thanks,
greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |