Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering | From | John Cherry <> | Date | Thu, 03 Mar 2005 13:49:50 -0800 |
| |
On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 00:21 -0500, Dave Jones wrote: <snip> > compile time regressions we should be able to nail down fairly easily. > (someone from OSDL is already doing compile stats and such on each release > [too bad they're mostly incomprehensible to the casual viewer])
Dave, I'm the "someone from OSDL". I agree that the compile stats and error/warning regresssions can be a little challenging to grock for the casual observer. Is it content or formatting that would help the casual viewer?
John
> The bigger problem is runtime testing. If things aren't getting the > exposure they need, we're going to get screwed over by something or other > every time Linus bk pull's some random driver repo. > > Dave > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |