[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: RFD: Kernel release numbering
Rather than mixing problem and solution, let me just define the two 
problems in this thread:

1) There is no clear, CONSISTENT point where "bugfixes only" begins.
Right now, it could be -rc2, -rc3, -rc4... who knows.

We need to send a clear signal to users "this is when you can really
start hammering it." A signal that does not change from release to
release. A signal that does not require intimate knowledge of the
kernel devel process.

This is a key reason why we don't get more pre-release testing.

2) After 2.6.11 release is out, there is no established process for "oh
shit, 2.6.11 users will really want that fixed."


Linus's even/odd proposal is an example of a solution for problem #2, as
is my 2.6.X.Y proposal.

The 2.4.x series -pre/-rc is an example of a solution for problem #1.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [W:0.281 / U:4.824 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site