lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: Off-by-one bug at unix_mkname ?
    From
    In article <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503281124450.18443@yvahk01.tjqt.qr> (at Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:25:39 +0200 (MEST)), Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de> says:

    >
    > On Mar 28 2005 17:39, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote:
    >
    > >+ * This may look like an off by one error but it is
    > >+ * a bit more subtle. 108 is the longest valid AF_UNIX
    > >+ * path for a binding. sun_path[108] doesnt as such
    > >+ * exist. However in kernel space we are guaranteed that
    > >+ * it is a valid memory location in our kernel
    > >+ * address buffer.
    > >+ */
    >
    > Now, does 2.6. _still_ guarantee that 108 is a valid offset?

    Yes, it does.

    --yoshfuji
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-04-06 13:31    [W:0.021 / U:1.872 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site