[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] API for true Random Number Generators to add entropy (2.6.11)
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 11:36:02 +1100
Herbert Xu <> wrote:

> On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 03:47:33AM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> >
> > It looks like we all misunderstand each other -
> > why do you think that if there will be kernel <-> kernel
> > RNG dataflow, then system will continuously spent all
> > it's time to produce that data?
> It doesn't matter whether it's like that or not.
> The point is if you do it in the kernel then either you'll have very
> coarse controls over the rate of data coming out of the hardware RNG,
> e.g., only on/off, or you'll have to put more code in to set the rate
> appropriately.

It is not the problem absolutely - just sleep if pool is full.
It will limit usage but this is better than nothing.

> Either way it's a loss compared to doing it in user-space.
> --
> Visit Openswan at
> Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <>
> Home Page:
> PGP Key:

Evgeniy Polyakov

Only failure makes us experts. -- Theo de Raadt
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-06 13:30    [W:0.084 / U:44.020 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site