lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: CPU scheduler tests
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 09:32:24 +0100, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
> * Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru> wrote:
>
> > Can someone (Ingo?) recommend me CPU scheduler tests which are usually
> > used to test CPU scheduler perfomance, context switch performance,
> > SMP/migration/balancing performance etc.?
>
> it's not really the microbenchmarks that matter (although they obviously
> are part of the picture), but actual application performance. There are
> dozens of workloads that matter. Kernel compilation timings are an
> obvious priority :-), but there are other things like SPECsdet, STREAM,
> dbt3-pgsql, kernbench, AIM7, various Java benchmarks and more.
>
> now that scheduler changes have calmed down somewhat, we are mainly
> looking for regressions, and are checking schedstats output to see how
> 'healthy' a given workload behaves.

Do you keep the results available somewhere they can be browsed?

Richard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-06 13:30    [W:0.028 / U:0.424 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site