Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Squashfs without ./.. | From | Andreas Schwab <> | Date | Thu, 24 Mar 2005 23:31:12 +0100 |
| |
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de> writes:
>>> > There's probably a number of apps that skip the first two dirents, instead >>> > of checking for the dot dirs. >>> Yep, check `-noleaf' in find(1) >>Then it is broken in several ways. >>First, file systems are not required to implement ".." (only "." is >>magical, ".." is a courtesy). > > Heh, what would happen if .. disappeared?
"." and ".." are handled in the VFS. No filesystem code ever sees them during lookup.
Andreas.
-- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |