lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Mar]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateWed, 23 Mar 2005 10:03:41 +0100
FromIngo Molnar <>
SubjectRe: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc1-V0.7.41-07
* Peter Zijlstra <peter@programming.kicks-ass.net> wrote:

> > i think the 'migrate read-count' method is not adequate either, because
> > all callbacks queued within an RCU read section must be called after the
> > lock has been dropped - while with the migration method CPU#1 would be
> > free to process callbacks queued in the RCU read section still active on
> > CPU#2.
>
> how about keeping the rcu callback list in process context and only
> splice it to a global (per cpu) list on rcu_read_unlock?

hm, that would indeed solve this problem. It would also solve the grace
period problem: all callbacks in the global (per-CPU) list are
immediately processable. Paul?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-06 13:30    [W:2.353 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans